<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>farmdocdaily</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8</id>
   <updated>2013-05-23T18:02:52Z</updated>
   <subtitle>The goal of the farmdoc project is to be at the forefront of harnessing the power of the Internet to deliver answers to the tough economic questions that agricultural producers and managers face. Since its inception over a decade ago the farmdoc project has consistently 
delivered unbiased and timely economic information and analysis to 
agricultural producers and businesses. Farmers, extension educators, farm 
managers, market analysts and many others across the U.S. and around the 
world have come to rely extensively on the comprehensive and current information and analysis available at farmdoc sites. Agricultural news in crop insurance, agricultural law, farmland values, crop prices, agricultural outlook, farm management and agricultural taxation.

 </subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 5.14-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Comparison of Approaches to Price Supports for the 2013 Farm Bill</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/comparison-price-supports-2013-farm-bill.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6052</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-23T18:03:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-23T18:02:52Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Last week the Senate and House Ag Committees successfully passed their versions of the 2013 Farm Bill. As discussed in a post from last week, price support programs now exist in both versions, making it highly likely that price supports will continue to be offered to the major program crops over the next Farm Bill period.
</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
   <category term="23" label="ace" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      Last week the Senate and House Ag Committees successfully passed their versions of the 2013 Farm Bill. As discussed in a post from last week, price support programs now exist in both versions, making it highly likely that price supports will continue to be offered to the major program crops over the next Farm Bill period.

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Rapid Corn Planting Progress, But Well Below the Record Pace</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/rapid-corn-planting-progress.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6050</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-22T13:52:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-22T13:53:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The USDA&apos;s weekly Crop Progress report indicated that 43 percent of the U.S. corn acreage was planted during the week ended May 19, 2013.  In terms of percentage of acreage planted, that equaled the record progress for the week ended May 10, 1992.   In 1992,  79.3 million acres of corn in the U.S. were planted, implying that 34.1 million acres were planted during the peak week that year.  U.S. corn planting intentions for 2013 were reported at 97.3 million acres, implying that 41.8 million acres were planted last week.  Conventional wisdom explains the rapid rate of planting progress this year as a function of larger and more technologically sophisticated planters. </summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Darrel Good" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Scott Irwin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="marketing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="outlook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="23" label="ace" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      <![CDATA[The USDA's weekly <em>Crop Progress</em> report indicated that 43 percent of the U.S. corn acreage was planted during the week ended May 19, 2013.  In terms of percentage of acreage planted, that equaled the record progress for the week ended May 10, 1992.   In 1992,  79.3 million acres of corn in the U.S. were planted, implying that 34.1 million acres were planted during the peak week that year.  U.S. corn planting intentions for 2013 were reported at 97.3 million acres, implying that 41.8 million acres were planted last week.  Conventional wisdom explains the rapid rate of planting progress this year as a function of larger and more technologically sophisticated planters. ]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Farmland Prices and Interest Rates</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/farmland-prices-interest-rates.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6049</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-21T17:55:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-21T18:04:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Farmland prices continue to increase during the first part of 2013.  However, farmland prices appear to be in line with current agricultural returns and current levels of interest rates.  Currently, interest rates are low, leading to support for high and increasing farmland prices.  A rising interest rate environment could lead to downward pressure being placed on farmland prices.  In this post, historical interest rates are examined to place the current interest rate environment into context.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Gary Schnitkey" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="farmland prices" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="management" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="23" label="ace" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      Farmland prices continue to increase during the first part of 2013.  However, farmland prices appear to be in line with current agricultural returns and current levels of interest rates.  Currently, interest rates are low, leading to support for high and increasing farmland prices.  A rising interest rate environment could lead to downward pressure being placed on farmland prices.  In this post, historical interest rates are examined to place the current interest rate environment into context.
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Corn and Soybean Prices Continue to Retrace 2012 Drought Rally</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/corn-soybean-prices-retrace-2012-rally.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6048</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-20T16:51:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-20T16:51:44Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Listen to MP3 podcast

Corn and soybean prices rallied sharply beginning in July 2012 as U.S. drought conditions unfolded.  It was generally expected that prices would follow the pattern experienced in other &quot;short crop&quot; years, with prices peaking near harvest and then returning to pre-drought levels later in the marketing year.  That pattern has generally unfolded, with some differences between corn and soybeans and between old crop and new crop prices.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Darrel Good" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="marketing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="outlook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="podcasts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="2" label="weekly outlook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://farmdoc.illinois.edu/podcasts/weeklyoutlook/Weekly_Outlook_052013.mp3">Listen to MP3 podcast</a>
<br>
Corn and soybean prices rallied sharply beginning in July 2012 as U.S. drought conditions unfolded.  It was generally expected that prices would follow the pattern experienced in other "short crop" years, with prices peaking near harvest and then returning to pre-drought levels later in the marketing year.  That pattern has generally unfolded, with some differences between corn and soybeans and between old crop and new crop prices.]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Changes in Farm Debt</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/changes-in-farm-debt.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6046</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-17T16:00:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-17T16:03:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The economic and financial environment that has been in place in the recent past has led to strong farm earnings.  While some expense categories have been high, the combination of yields and prices has been such that earnings have exceeded expectations.  While earnings have been good, there has been a record level of investment back into the farm; some of that has been with cash and some has been with borrowed funds.  Today&apos;s post will look at the changes in leverage that have taken place from 1996 to 2012 as measured by the Interest Expense Ratio.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Staff</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Brad Zwilling" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Dwight Raab" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="farm finance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="management" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="30" label="fbfm" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      The economic and financial environment that has been in place in the recent past has led to strong farm earnings.  While some expense categories have been high, the combination of yields and prices has been such that earnings have exceeded expectations.  While earnings have been good, there has been a record level of investment back into the farm; some of that has been with cash and some has been with borrowed funds.  Today&apos;s post will look at the changes in leverage that have taken place from 1996 to 2012 as measured by the Interest Expense Ratio.
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>A Farm Bill Update: More Changes to Commodity Programs</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/farm-bill-update-changes.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6045</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-16T17:14:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-23T17:19:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>After creating a one-year extension to the 2008 Farm Bill in the midst of larger budget issues at the end of last year, Congress has resumed the Farm Bill process.  Both the Senate and House Ag Committees have released 2013 Farm Bill markups. Both the Senate and House drafts are similar to the versions passed by the full Senate and House Ag Committee in 2012 in that the majority of existing commodity programs (direct, countercyclical, ACRE, and SURE programs) are repealed to achieve spending reductions. However, there have been some slight changes to the programs created to replace those being repealed, particularly in the new version from the Senate.  Today&apos;s post provides a summary of some of those commodity program changes. Discussion of continued changes in other titles, such as Crop Insurance, and the budget implications will be saved for future posts.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Nick Paulson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="23" label="ace" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      After creating a one-year extension to the 2008 Farm Bill in the midst of larger budget issues at the end of last year, Congress has resumed the Farm Bill process.  Both the Senate and House Ag Committees have released 2013 Farm Bill markups. Both the Senate and House drafts are similar to the versions passed by the full Senate and House Ag Committee in 2012 in that the majority of existing commodity programs (direct, countercyclical, ACRE, and SURE programs) are repealed to achieve spending reductions. However, there have been some slight changes to the programs created to replace those being repealed, particularly in the new version from the Senate.  Today&apos;s post provides a summary of some of those commodity program changes. Discussion of continued changes in other titles, such as Crop Insurance, and the budget implications will be saved for future posts.
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Keeping the Family Informed: Estate and Succession Planning</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/keeping-family-informed.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6043</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-15T14:55:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-15T14:55:52Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A prior article, &quot;Updating your Estate and Succession Plan&quot; discussed why a prior estate plan might not produce the results you expected due to law changes. This article discusses the reaction your heirs might have if they only learn of your plans at the reading of the will.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Gary Hoff" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="taxation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="28" label="taxschool" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      A prior article, &quot;Updating your Estate and Succession Plan&quot; discussed why a prior estate plan might not produce the results you expected due to law changes. This article discusses the reaction your heirs might have if they only learn of your plans at the reading of the will.
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Supreme Court Decision in Monsanto Case</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/supreme-court-decision-monsanto.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6041</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-14T19:27:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-14T21:28:46Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Earlier this year the Supreme Court heard arguments in a patent law case pertaining to Monsanto&apos;s Round Up Ready technology. The unanimous decision delivered Monday May 13, 2013 upheld a lower court&apos;s decision against Indiana farmer Vernon Bowman. </summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="A. Bryan Endres" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="23" label="ace" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      Earlier this year the Supreme Court heard arguments in a patent law case pertaining to Monsanto&apos;s Round Up Ready technology. The unanimous decision delivered Monday May 13, 2013 upheld a lower court&apos;s decision against Indiana farmer Vernon Bowman. 
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Balance Sheets on Grain Farms from 2005 to 2011</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/balance-sheets-grain-farms.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6042</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-14T18:30:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-14T18:37:05Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Listen to MP3 podcast

The period of high grain farm incomes since 2006 has led to an overall strengthening of balance sheets on grain farms.  Some concerns exist that much of this strengthening could erode quickly during a period of lower returns and declining farmland prices.  While these concerns are legitimate, farmers have generally prepared themselves well to withstand lower returns.  How much financial stress farms face likely will depend on the ability to curtail capital expenditures and family living withdrawals once a lower returns environment occurs.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Gary Schnitkey" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="farm finance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="management" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="23" label="ace" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://farmdoc.illinois.edu/podcasts/fefo/FEFO_13_09.mp3">Listen to MP3 podcast</a>
<br>
The period of high grain farm incomes since 2006 has led to an overall strengthening of balance sheets on grain farms.  Some concerns exist that much of this strengthening could erode quickly during a period of lower returns and declining farmland prices.  While these concerns are legitimate, farmers have generally prepared themselves well to withstand lower returns.  How much financial stress farms face likely will depend on the ability to curtail capital expenditures and family living withdrawals once a lower returns environment occurs.]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Market Size for US Corn and Soybeans</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/market-size-us-corn-soybeans.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6040</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-13T16:22:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-13T16:23:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Listen to MP3 podcast

The USDA&apos;s May 10 WASDE report contained supply and consumption projections for the 2013-14 marketing year for U.S. corn and soybeans.  For the most part, the market focused on the projections of crop size, but the most important information is in the projections of marketing year consumption. </summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Darrel Good" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="marketing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="outlook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="podcasts" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="2" label="weekly outlook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://farmdoc.illinois.edu/podcasts/weeklyoutlook/Weekly_Outlook_051313.mp3">Listen to MP3 podcast</a>
<br>
The USDA's May 10 WASDE report contained supply and consumption projections for the 2013-14 marketing year for U.S. corn and soybeans.  For the most part, the market focused on the projections of crop size, but the most important information is in the projections of marketing year consumption. ]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Comparing Current and 1970 Farm Prosperity: Cash Farm Expenses</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/current-1970-farm-prosperity-cash-expenses.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6039</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-10T15:17:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-10T15:21:00Z</updated>
   
   <summary>This post is the 4th in a series that contrasts and compares the farm prosperity of the 1970s with the current period of farm prosperity.  This post examines U.S. farm expenses during the two periods.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Carl Zulauf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="finance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="management" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="25" label="osu" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      This post is the 4th in a series that contrasts and compares the farm prosperity of the 1970s with the current period of farm prosperity.  This post examines U.S. farm expenses during the two periods.
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Payments by U.S. Farm Safety Net Program: Differences by Crop</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/payments-us-farm-safety-net-crops.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6038</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-09T16:37:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-09T16:37:29Z</updated>
   
   <summary>An important aspect of the on-going debate over the new farm bill is the proposed elimination of direct payments.  This proposal differentially impacts the program crops, prompting a debate among crops and geographical regions over the distribution of payments by farm safety net programs.  We believe this issue is the most important in the farm bill debate.  We therefore examine it in more detail.  This post specifically compares the distribution of payments by the direct payment, crop insurance, and price risk programs.  The comparison begins with the 2003 crop year because the counter-cyclical program, an important price risk program, was initially enacted in the 2002 Farm Bill.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Carl Zulauf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Gary Schnitkey" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="crop insurance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="23" label="ace" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25" label="osu" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      An important aspect of the on-going debate over the new farm bill is the proposed elimination of direct payments.  This proposal differentially impacts the program crops, prompting a debate among crops and geographical regions over the distribution of payments by farm safety net programs.  We believe this issue is the most important in the farm bill debate.  We therefore examine it in more detail.  This post specifically compares the distribution of payments by the direct payment, crop insurance, and price risk programs.  The comparison begins with the 2003 crop year because the counter-cyclical program, an important price risk program, was initially enacted in the 2002 Farm Bill.
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Updating your Estate and Succession Plan</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/updating-estate-succession-plan.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6037</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-08T15:00:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-08T15:00:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) addressed many of the tax issues concerning taxpayers. ATRA made permanent many of the tax provisions that were scheduled to expire. For example, it provided a permanent exemption amount for the alternative minimum tax (AMT) and, more importantly, it indexed it for inflation. </summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Gary Hoff" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="taxation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="28" label="taxschool" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) addressed many of the tax issues concerning taxpayers. ATRA made permanent many of the tax provisions that were scheduled to expire. For example, it provided a permanent exemption amount for the alternative minimum tax (AMT) and, more importantly, it indexed it for inflation. 
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Questions That Will be the Focus of the Upcoming Farm Bill Debate</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/questions-focus-farm-bill-debate.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6036</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-07T14:52:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-07T15:15:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Farm Bill markup likely will begin soon in both the Senate and House Agricultural committees.   Much of the focus for traditional program crops will be around three programs:  a revenue program, a target price program, and a supplemental crop insurance program. While the exact nature of the programs will depend on negotiations, what is almost certain is that the programs&apos; rationale will be risk management.  Given a risk management focus, Farm Bill negotiations will need to debate and somehow resolve the following seven questions.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Carl Zulauf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Gary Schnitkey" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="23" label="ace" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25" label="osu" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      Farm Bill markup likely will begin soon in both the Senate and House Agricultural committees.   Much of the focus for traditional program crops will be around three programs:  a revenue program, a target price program, and a supplemental crop insurance program. While the exact nature of the programs will depend on negotiations, what is almost certain is that the programs&apos; rationale will be risk management.  Given a risk management focus, Farm Bill negotiations will need to debate and somehow resolve the following seven questions.
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>A Mixed Rate of Corn Consumption, But Does It Matter?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/mixed-corn-consumption-does-it-matter.html" />
   <id>tag:farmdocdaily.illinois.edu,2013://8.6035</id>
   
   <published>2013-05-06T15:54:00Z</published>
   <updated>2013-05-06T16:09:42Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Most of the discussion in the corn market has centered on U.S. planting progress, the likely magnitude of planted acreage, and the U.S. average yield potential.  The pace of planting as revealed by the USDA&apos;s weekly Crop Progress report will continue to be monitored closely for clues about production potential.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Site Administrator</name>
      <uri>www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Darrel Good" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="marketing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="outlook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="2" label="weekly outlook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/">
      <![CDATA[Most of the discussion in the corn market has centered on U.S. planting progress, the likely magnitude of planted acreage, and the U.S. average yield potential.  The pace of planting as revealed by the USDA's weekly <em>Crop Progress</em> report will continue to be monitored closely for clues about production potential.]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
